Or What’s Wrong with Royalty
Many smart and rational people would agree that the world would be a better place if women were in charge. But that’s nonsense. There is one very good reason why having women in charge would be an awful idea. It’s really very simple. If women were in charge, there would be a whole lot more of this:
|Source: Getty Images|
Sure, weddings are nice, but there’s a reason you didn’t pay for my wedding – because I’m not royalty and you’re taxes don’t support me. There’s also a reason the women around you won’t shut up about this whole royal wedding nonsense. You see, it’s every girl’s dream to grow up and marry a prince.
If women ran the world, there would be more princesses, which means more weddings and more royalty. And guess who’s paying for it? You got it, sucka.
So what does that leave us with?
Yes, men. Hunters. Conquerors. Athletes. Governors. Men invented democracy, the antidote to royalty. Do you think it’s a coincidence that having a
penis white penis was a requirement to rule in Greece, Rome, and America? No. No, it was not.
|Pictured: Testosterone. Not pictured: Estrogen.|
Now, I know there are some problems with men running the show. Most point out that men are more violent and therefore wage more wars than women would. But at least wars are helping to control the population. Since controlling our libidos is not an option, we have cleverly figured out a way of dealing with the consequences of said libidos. So there.
So the next time you hear someone say that the world would be better off if it were ruled by women, just spit this back at them. Boys rule, girls drool.